<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remember This?&#8230;&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mrambler.com/blog/2007/05/31/remember-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mrambler.com/blog/2007/05/31/remember-this/</link>
	<description>We are community ramblings.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jek</title>
		<link>http://www.mrambler.com/blog/2007/05/31/remember-this/comment-page-1/#comment-6214</link>
		<dc:creator>Jek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 03:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrambler.com/blog/?p=438#comment-6214</guid>
		<description>I was on-call that night for the software company I worked for at the time.  We got one false call at 9:36pm (Seattle time).  And then I got a call at 3am with a real problem.  Fortunately it was mostly cosmetic.  We, and I expect most companies, worked very hard for the preceding 6 months to make sure things would be smooth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was on-call that night for the software company I worked for at the time.  We got one false call at 9:36pm (Seattle time).  And then I got a call at 3am with a real problem.  Fortunately it was mostly cosmetic.  We, and I expect most companies, worked very hard for the preceding 6 months to make sure things would be smooth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zook</title>
		<link>http://www.mrambler.com/blog/2007/05/31/remember-this/comment-page-1/#comment-6182</link>
		<dc:creator>zook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 14:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrambler.com/blog/?p=438#comment-6182</guid>
		<description>I always found it a bit odd that we would have a problem with 2000: to introduce a decimal error to a binary machine seems oddly byzantine.

You&#039;ll have another chance to sit in fear before the TV in 2038.  Many computer systems keep track of the date as the number of seconds since 1 January 1970, and if they use a signed 32-bit number for this, then the clock will roll over sometime in early 2038.

Of course, by then everyone should be using 64-bit numbers (at least), and if we&#039;ve moved to signed 64-bit quantities we shouldn&#039;t have problems until the year 292271025015.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always found it a bit odd that we would have a problem with 2000: to introduce a decimal error to a binary machine seems oddly byzantine.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll have another chance to sit in fear before the TV in 2038.  Many computer systems keep track of the date as the number of seconds since 1 January 1970, and if they use a signed 32-bit number for this, then the clock will roll over sometime in early 2038.</p>
<p>Of course, by then everyone should be using 64-bit numbers (at least), and if we&#8217;ve moved to signed 64-bit quantities we shouldn&#8217;t have problems until the year 292271025015.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

